Southern Qiang | |
---|---|
Region | Sichuan Province |
Ethnicity | Qiang people |
Native speakers | (81,000 cited 1999) |
Language family | Sino-Tibetan |
Language codes | |
ISO 639-3 | qxs |
Glottolog | sout2728 |
ELP | Southern Qiang |
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA. |
Southern Qiang is a Sino-Tibetan language of the Qiangic branch spoken by approximately 81,300 people along the Minjiang (Chinese: 岷江) river in Sichuan Province, China.
Southern Qiang dialects preserve archaic pronoun flexions, while they have disappeared in Northern Qiang. Unlike its close relative Northern Qiang, Southern Qiang is a tonal language.
Southern Qiang dialects
Southern Qiang is spoken in Li County (in Taoping Chinese: 桃坪, etc.), Wenchuan County (in Longxi 龙溪, Luobozhai 萝卜寨, Miansi 绵虒, etc.), and parts of Mao County. It consists of seven dialects: Dajishan, Taoping, Longxi, Mianchi, Heihu, Sanlong, and Jiaochang, which are greatly divergent and are not mutually intelligible.
Names seen in the older literature for Southern Qiang dialects include Lofuchai (Lophuchai, Lopu Chai), Wagsod (Wa-gsod, Waszu), and Outside/Outer Mantse (Man-tzŭ). The Southern Qiang dialect of Puxi Township has been documented in detail by Huang (2007).
Liu (1998) adds Sānlóng (Chinese: 三龍) and Jiàocháng (較場) as Southern subdialects.
Sims (2016) characterizes Southern Qiang as the perfective agreement suffixes innovation group. Individual dialects are highlighted in italics.
- Southern Qiang
- 'inward' *ji innovation subgroup
- 'downward' *ɚ innovation subgroup
Phonology
The consonants of Southern Qiang are presented in the table below:
Labial | Dental | Retroflex | Palato- alveolar |
Palatal | Velar | Uvular | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
plain | sibilant | ||||||||
Stop/ Affricate |
voiceless | p | t | ts | ʈʂ | tʃ | tɕ | k | q |
aspirated | pʰ | tʰ | tsʰ | ʈʂʰ | tʃʰ | tɕʰ | kʰ | qʰ | |
voiced | b | d | dz | ɖʐ | dʒ | dʑ | ɡ | ɢ | |
Fricative | voiceless | f | s | ʂ | ʃ | ɕ | (x) | χ | |
voiced | z | ʐ | ʒ | ʑ | (ɣ) | ʁ | |||
Nasal | m | n | ɲ | ŋ | |||||
Approximant | l | j, ɥ | w |
- /χ ʁ/ are heard as velar before front vowels.
- /f/ is also heard as a bilabial .
The vowels of Southern Qiang are presented in the table below:
Front | Central | Back | |
---|---|---|---|
Close | i y | u | |
Mid | e | ə ə˞ | o |
Open | a | ɑ | |
Syllabic | ɹ̩ |
- Vowels /e u/ can also be heard as .
Tones
Southern Qiang dialects have widely varying tones. The tones become more numerous and distinct the farther the dialect is from the Northern group. Evans (2001) lists the following tonal systems:
Taoping Qiang
The dialect of Taoping has six tones. Liu (1998) reports 4,900 speakers. Out of 1,754 analyzed syllables, the tones are distributed as follows:
- (33/Mid): 43.6%
- (55/High): 28.2%
- (31/Mid-falling): 19.2%
- (241/Low-rising-falling): 5.4%; occurs only with voiced initials
- (13/Low-rising): 2.5%; occurs only in Mandarin loanwords (from the fourth tone, realized as 25 locally) and in coalescence
- (51/High-falling): 1.2%; occurs only in Mandarin loanwords (from the third tone, realized as 53 locally)
Longxi Qiang
The dialect of Longxi has five tones, of which the two "major" tones make up 98.9% of the 6,150 analyzed syllables. Liu (1998) reports 3,300 speakers. The tones are distributed as follows on the analyzed syllables:
- (33~31/Mid~Mid-falling): 63.61%
- (55/High): 35.33%
- (13~213/Low(-falling)-rising): 0.70%; occurs only with voiced initials
- (35/Mid-rising): 0.31%; occurs only in loanwords and in coalesced syllables
- (51/High-falling): 0.05%; occurs only in coalesced syllables, loanwords, and with syllabified pre-initials
Mianchi Qiang
The dialect of Mianchi has 15,700 speakers according to Liu (1998). Its tones are added to a pitch-accent system of high and low(-falling) pitch, wherein native words may only have one accented syllable. A phonological word may be accented or unaccented, and the accent may for the most part occur on any syllable. Of the 6,369 syllables analyzed, over 95% follow this system; the remaining few have one of three contour tones:
- (31/Unaccented): 67.3%
- (55/Accented): 27.9%
- (13~213/Low(-falling)-rising): 3.5%
- (51/High-falling): 1.2%
- (35/Mid-rising): 0.01%; occurs only in loanwords and coalesced syllables
Other dialects
The dialects that border the Northern Qiang area, such as that of Heihu, Mao County, use tone exclusively to distinguish native words and loanwords.
Wen (1950) reports that the dialect of Jiuziying utilizes a pitch-accent system, claiming that "only when two or more syllables are in juxtaposition is a pitch-accent definitely required, especially for homophones." Below is a table comparing some vocabulary of the dialects of Jiuziying, Taoping, Longxi, and Mianchi.
Gloss | Jiuziying | Taoping | Longxi | Mianchi |
---|---|---|---|---|
last year | nɤ́ pɤ́ | ȵi pǝ | nǝ́ pù | né pù |
two years | nɤ̀ pɤ̀ | |||
pheasant | í dzú | i dʑy | ỳ-zó | |
friend | ì dzù | ì zù ~ ỳ zù | ì dʑòu | |
inside | kò kò | ko ko | kù kú | qò qó |
elder brother | kó kò | à kò | qó qò | |
uncle | pà pá | pe pe | á pà | |
father | pá pà | pɑ pɑ |
In the dialect of Hou'ergu, Li County, tones are variable on monosyllables depending on the directional prefix (e.g. sɹ̩ t'ie; sɹ̩ t'ie; dæ t'ie). However, tones are stable on polysyllables.
The tones of the Lobuzhai dialect often have variation in their pitch patterns (e.g. so ɲi ~ so ɲi), although this is not always the case.
Status
As with many of the Qiangic languages, Southern Qiang is becoming increasingly threatened. Because the education system largely uses Standard Chinese as a medium of instruction for the Qiang people, and as a result of the universal access to schooling and television, most Qiang children are fluent or even monolingual in Chinese while an increasing percentage cannot speak Qiang.
See also
References
- Southern Qiang at Ethnologue (18th ed., 2015) (subscription required)
- Guillaume, Jacques (2007). "A shared suppletive pattern in the pronominal systems of Chang Naga and Southern Qiang". Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale. 36 (1): 4.
- McCoy, John, ed. (1986). Contributions to Sino-Tibetan Studies. Leiden: E.J. Brill. pp. 40, 65. ISBN 90-04-07850-9.
- Sun, Jackson T.-S. (1992). "Review of Zangmianyu Yuyin He Cihui "Tibeto-Burman Phonology and Lexicon"" (PDF). Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area. 15 (2): 76–77.
- Huang, Chenglong 黄成龙 (2007). Púxī Qiāngyǔ yánjiū 蒲溪羌语研究 [Studies on Puxi Qiang] (in Chinese). Beijing shi: Minzu chubanshe. ISBN 978-7-105-08977-2.
- Liu, Guangkun 刘光坤 (1998). Máwō Qiāngyǔ yánjiū 麻窝羌语研究 [Studies on Mawo Qiang] (in Chinese). Chengdu: Sichuan minzu chubanshe. ISBN 7-5409-2116-1.
- Sims, N. (2016). "Towards a More Comprehensive Understanding of Qiang Dialectology" (PDF). Language and Linguistics. 17 (3): 351–381. doi:10.1177/1606822X15586685.
- ^ Sun, Hongkai 孙宏开 (1981). Qiāngyǔ jiǎnzhì 羌语简志 (in Chinese). Minzu chubanshe.
- Evans, Jonathan P. (2001). Contact-Induced Tonogenesis in Southern Qiang. Michigan State University and Oakland University. pp. 65–67.
- LaPolla, Randy J. (2003). A Grammar of Qiang: With Annotated Texts and Glossary. with Chenglong Huan. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. p. 5. ISBN 3-11-017829-X.
Bibliography
- Bradley, David (1997). "Tibeto-Burman Languages and Classification" (PDF). In Bradley, D. (ed.). Papers in South East Asian Linguistics No. 14: Tibeto-Burman Languages of the Himalayas. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics. pp. 1–72. ISBN 0-85883-456-1.
- Chang, Kun 張琨 (1967). "A Comparative Study of the Southern Ch'iang 蒐 Dialects". Monumenta Serica. 26 (1): 422–444. doi:10.1080/02549948.1967.11744974.
- Evans, Jonathan P. (2001a). Introduction to Qiang Lexicon and Phonology: Synchrony and Diachrony. Tokyo: ILCAA, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.
Sino-Tibetan branches | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Western Himalayas (Himachal, Uttarakhand, Nepal, Sikkim) |
| ||||
Eastern Himalayas (Tibet, Bhutan, Arunachal) | |||||
Myanmar and Indo- Burmese border |
| ||||
East and Southeast Asia |
| ||||
Dubious (possible isolates) (Arunachal) |
| ||||
Proposed groupings | |||||
Proto-languages | |||||
Italics indicates single languages that are also considered to be separate branches. |
Na-Qiangic languages | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Naic |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Ersuic | |||||||||||||||||||
Qiangic |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Cross (†) and italics indicate extinct languages. |
Languages of China | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Official | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regional |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indigenous |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minority | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Varieties of Chinese | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Creole/Mixed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extinct | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sign |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This Sino-Tibetan languages-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |