Misplaced Pages

Jie language

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Unclassified extinct language formerly spoken in northeast China Not to be confused with Jie dialect.
Jie
Chieh
*Kɨr/*Kjet
Native toLater Zhao dynasty
RegionNorthern China
EthnicityJie people
Era4th century
Language familyProbably Yeniseian or Turkic
Writing systemtranscribed with Chinese characters
Language codes
ISO 639-3None (mis)
GlottologNone
Map of Sixteen Kingdoms in year 338, showing the Later Zhao, a state ruled by the Jie.

Jie (simplified Chinese: 羯语; traditional Chinese: 羯語; pinyin: Jiéyǔ) is an unclassified extinct language formerly spoken in northeast China during the Later Zhao dynasty by the Jie people, who were formerly part of the Xiongnu confederation. It has been variously considered to be of either Yeniseian or Turkic affiliation.

Attestation

Only one phrase in the native language of the Jie is known. The source for this phrase was the Kuchean Buddhist monk and missionary Fotudeng. It was recorded in the Book of Jin as 秀支替戾岡,僕穀劬禿當 and said to have a connection to Shi Le's fight against Liu Yao in 328. The phrase was glossed with a Chinese translation:

Text Middle Chinese Gloss
秀支 軍 "army"
替戾岡 出 "go out"
僕穀 劉曜胡位 Liu Yao's barbarian title
劬禿當 捉 "capture"

Analysis

Turkic

This phrase has been analyzed in a number of publications. Shiratori (1900), Ramstedt (1922), Bazin (1948), von Gabain (1950), Shervashidze (1986), and Shimunek (2015) recognized Turkic lexicon, and gave their versions of the transcription and translation:

Ramstedt Bazin von Gabain Shervashidze Shimunek
Sükä talıqın
bügüg tutun!
Süg tägti ıdqaŋ
boquγıγ tutqaŋ!
Särig tılıtqan
buγuγ kötürkän
Sükâ tol'iqtin
buγuγ qodigo(d)tin
su-Ø kete-r erkan
boklug-gu tukta-ŋ
Go with a war
capture bügü!
Send the army to attack,
capture the commander!
You'd put forth the army,
you'd take the deer
You came to the army
Deposed buγuγ
When/as the army goes out,
capture the Boklug!

Yeniseian

Edwin G. Pulleyblank (1963) argued that the Turkic interpretations cannot be considered very successful because they conflict with the phonetic values of the Chinese text and with the Chinese translation. Instead, he suggested a connection with the Yeniseian languages, as well as remarking on the Yeniseian verb ending -ŋ, particularly common in Kott.

Alexander Vovin (2000) gave the following translation based on Yeniseian, corroborating Pulleyblank's findings. Vovin (2000) suggests a connection with the Southern Yeniseian branch, which has found support from other Yeniseianists.

suke

armies

t-i-r-ek-ang

PV-CM-PERF-go out-3P

bok-kok

bok-kok

k-o-t-o-kt-ang

PV-?-OBJ-CM-catch-3P

suke t-i-r-ek-ang bok-kok k-o-t-o-kt-ang

armies {PV-CM-PERF-go out-3P} bok-kok PV-?-OBJ-CM-catch-3P

Armies have gone out. will catch Bokkok.

The verbal ending -ŋ can be seen in Jie, which is a common verb ending in Yeniseian languages, particularly Kott. The cognate form of the Jie words "kot-o-kt-aŋ" 'they will catch' in Ket is "d-kas-a-qos-n", showing the characteristic of Pumpokol where the sound /t/ corresponds the Ket sound /s/, thus Jie is thought to be closely related to Pumpokol. The Arin word 'kel' 'fight' partly coincides in the second syllable of *śuke 'army', however the connection is dubious and Vovin suggested it to be a loanword, because if Pumpokolic speakers became part of Xiongnu, the word for army would have likely been loaned.

Vovin et al. (2016) revise the above translation, as well as mapping the verbs over a Ket verb template and criticizing Shimunek et al.'s interpretation of the couplet.

śuke

army/armies?

t-il-ek-ang

out-PAST-go-3ANIM.PL.SBJ

bok-kok

?

got-o-kt-aŋ

foot(?)-3MASC.SG.OBJ-take-3ANIM.PL.SBJ

śuke t-il-ek-ang bok-kok got-o-kt-aŋ

army/armies? {out-PAST-go-3ANIM.PL.SBJ} ? {foot(?)-3MASC.SG.OBJ-take-3ANIM.PL.SBJ}

Armies went out and will catch Bokkok!

Notes

  1. Middle Chinese pronunciation follows Pulleyblank.

References

  1. ^ Pulleyblank, Edwin George (1963). "The consonantal system of Old Chinese. Part II" (PDF). Asia Major. 9: 206–265. Retrieved 2011-02-06.
  2. ^ Shimunek, Andrew; Beckwith, Christopher I.; Washington, Jonathan North; Kontovas, Nicholas; Niyaz, Kurban (2015). "The Earliest Attested Turkic Language: The Chieh (*Kir) Language of the Fourth Century A.D." Journal Asiatique. 303 (1): 143–151. doi:10.2143/JA.303.1.3085124.
  3. ^ Vovin, Alexander; Vajda, Edward; de la Vaissière, Etienne (2016). "Who Were the *Kjet (羯) and What Language Did They Speak?". Journal Asiatique. 304 (1): 125–144. doi:10.2143/JA.304.1.3146838.
  4. ^ Fang Xuanling, Book of Jin, ibid., Vol. 95, pp. 12b-13a
  5. 张昌圣. "《晋书·佛图澄传》之羯语探源". 四川大学学报: 哲学社会科学版 3 (1995): 48-56.
  6. Shiratori, Kurakichi, Uber die Sprache des Hiung-nu Stammes und der Tung-hu-Stdmme, Tokyo, 1900
  7. Ramstedt G.J., "Zur Frage nach der Stellung des Tschuwassischen" (On the question of the position of the Chuvash), Journal de la Société finno-ougrienne 38, 1922, pp. 1–34
  8. Bazin, Louis (1948). "Un texte proto-turc du IVe siècle: le distique hiong-nou du "Tsin-chou"". Oriens. 1 (2): 208–219. doi:10.2307/1578997. JSTOR 1578997.
  9. von Gabain, Annemarie (1950). "Louis Bazin: Un texte proto-turc du IVe siècle: le distique hiong-nou du "Tsin-chou" (Besprechung)". Der Islam. 29: 244–246.
  10. Shervashidze I.N. "Verb forms in the language of the Turkic runiform inscriptions", Tbilisi, 1986, pp. 3–9
  11. Vovin, Alexander (2000). "Did the Xiong-nu Speak a Yeniseian Language?". Central Asiatic Journal. 44 (1): 87–104. ISSN 0008-9192. JSTOR 41928223.
Yeniseian languages
Ketic
Kottic
Arinic
Pumpokolic
Para-Yeniseian?
Reconstructed
Italics indicate extinct languages.
Turkic languages
Proto-language
Common Turkic
Argu
Karluk
Western
Eastern
Old
Kipchak
Bulgar
Cuman
Kyrgyz
Nogai
Oghuz
Eastern
Southern
Western
Siberian
Northern
Southern
Sayan
Steppe
Taiga
Yenisei
Old
Oghur
Disputed classification
Potentially Turkic languages
Creoles and pidgins
Categories: