 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| The office of the national president is united with that of the national chancellor. In consequence, the former powers of the national president pass to the leader and national chancellor, Adolf Hitler. He appoints his deputy. Do you, German man, and you, German woman, approve of the arrangement made in this law? | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 Results by Gau | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes
No
A referendum on merging the posts of Chancellor and President was held in Nazi Germany on 19 August 1934, seventeen days after the death of President Paul von Hindenburg. The German leadership sought to gain approval for Adolf Hitler's assumption of supreme power. The referendum was associated with widespread intimidation of voters and significant electoral fraud.
Hitler used the resultant large "yes" vote to claim public support to succeed Hindenburg as the de facto head of state of Germany, though he had assumed presidential powers in addition to his own powers as Chancellor immediately upon Hindenburg's death. The referendum was meant to legitimise that move and allowed Hitler to take the title Führer und Reichskanzler (Führer and Reich Chancellor).
Background
Hitler's rise to power
Weimar President Paul von Hindenburg appointed Adolf Hitler as Chancellor on 30 January 1933. After his appointment, he wanted the Reichstag to pass an "enabling act" to allow his government to pass laws directly, without the support of the Reichstag. Lacking the two-thirds supermajority necessary to pass such an act, Hindenburg dissolved the Reichstag on 31 January. In the resulting election, the Nazis won 43.9% of the vote. Including his allies, Hitler enjoyed the support of 60% of the deputies, but needed the support of the Catholic Centre Party to reach the required threshold to pass the Enabling Act. After securing their support by promising to respect the rights of the Catholic Church, it passed 441–94. With its passage, Hitler had effectively become a dictator. However, Hindenburg technically retained the ability to dismiss Hitler.
After all other parties were formally banned in July 1933, Hindenburg's power to dismiss Hitler was the only means by which Hitler could be legally dismissed, and thus the only check on his power. This fact was brought home to Hitler in the summer of 1934, when Hindenburg grew so outraged at escalating Nazi excesses that he threatened to sack Hitler and declare martial law unless Hitler acted immediately to end the tension. Hitler responded by ordering the Night of the Long Knives, in which several SA leaders, including Ernst Röhm, were murdered along with several of Hitler's other past rivals.
Elections in Nazi Germany
The Weimar Constitution allowed the President to refer legislation passed by the Reichstag to a referendum. A referendum would also be held if 10% of eligible voters proposed an initiative. On 14 July 1933, the German cabinet used the Enabling Act to pass the "Law concerning the Plebiscite", which permitted the cabinet to call a referendum on "questions of national policy" and "laws which the cabinet had enacted". While the Weimar provisions allowing for referenda were not explicitly repealed, subsequent legislation made it clear those provisions would not be used.
On 12 November 1933, the cabinet used this authority to hold a referendum on withdrawing from the League of Nations. Officially, 95.1% of voters supported withdrawal on a turnout of 96.3%. While there was undoubtedly considerable pressure to vote in the affirmative, historians Hedwig Richter and Ralph Jessen argue that "fraud and manipulation were not so prevalent as to fundamentally distort the results". According to them "This has been repeatedly confirmed by regional studies of the procedure of actual elections and by the records of private individuals" for elections in Nazi Germany (excluding 1936), although there were "repeated cases of manipulation and fraud" and "political terror".
The referendum
Hitler had known as early as April 1934 that Hindenburg would likely be dead by the end of the year. He spent much of the runup working to get the armed forces to support him as Hindenburg's successor. On 1 August, with Hindenburg's death imminent, the cabinet passed the Law Concerning the Head of State of the German Reich. It stipulated that upon Hindenburg's death, the offices of President (head of state) and Chancellor (head of government) would be merged. Hindenburg died the following day. Three hours later, Hitler issued a decree announcing that he had assumed the president's powers in accordance with the new law. He also called for a referendum to approve his actions. He publicly argued that the presidency had become so linked with Hindenburg that the title should not be used again.
Conduct
.jpg)
On 19 August 1934, voters were asked the question:
The office of the national president is united with that of the national chancellor. In consequence, the former powers of the national president pass to the leader and national chancellor, Adolf Hitler. He appoints his deputy.
Do you, German man, and you, German woman, approve of the arrangement made in this law?
The government used widespread intimidation and electoral fraud to secure a large "yes" vote. This included stationing storm troopers at polling stations and forcibly escorting clubs and societies to polling stations. In some places, polling booths were removed, or banners reading "only traitors enter here" hung over the entrances to discourage secret voting. In addition, many ballot papers were pre-marked with "yes" votes, spoiled ballot papers were frequently counted as having been "yes" votes and many "no" votes were recorded to have been in favour of the referendum question. The extent of the fraud meant that in some areas, the number of votes recorded to have been cast was greater than the number of people able to vote.
The relative lack of support in Hamburg in 1933 prompted Hitler to declare a "virtual national holiday" on 17 August 1934 so that he could address the German people directly over the 4.3 million registered radio sets.
The referendum itself, as well as all efforts to make Hitler head of state, violated the Enabling Act. Although that act gave Hitler the right to pass laws that were contrary to the constitution, it stated that the president's powers were to remain "undisturbed", which has long been interpreted to forbid any attempt to tamper with the presidency. The constitution had also previously been amended in 1932 to make the president of the High Court of Justice (Erwin Bumke in 1934), not the chancellor, first in the line of succession to the presidency and even then only on an interim basis until fresh elections.
Results
Officially, "yes" easily won with slightly less than 90% of the vote. Support for merging the offices of president and chancellor was greatest in East Prussia, where official figures show that 96% voted in favour. Support was lowest in urban districts. It was least strong in Hamburg, where just under 80% voted affirmatively (20.4% against). In Berlin, 18.5% of votes were negative and every district reported a negative vote share greater than 10%. In the former Communist stronghold of Wedding, just under 20% voted against. Overall support for the government was lower than in the referendum of 12 November 1933, when the government had received support from 95.1% of the total electorate: the percentage of the population voting against the government had more than doubled.
| Choice | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| For | 38,394,848 | 89.93 | |
| Against | 4,300,370 | 10.07 | |
| Total | 42,695,218 | 100.00 | |
| Valid votes | 42,695,218 | 97.99 | |
| Invalid/blank votes | 873,668 | 2.01 | |
| Total votes | 43,568,886 | 100.00 | |
| Registered voters/turnout | 45,552,059 | 95.65 | |
| Source: Nohlen & Stöver 2010, p. 770 | |||
Reactions and aftermath
The referendum did not change the status quo; Hitler had already assumed the presidency upon the death of Hindenburg. Some in the Nazi leadership were disappointed by the results of the referendum. For instance, Joseph Goebbels's diary entry for 22 August speaks of the referendum as a failure: "Initial results: very bad. Then better. Finally over 38 million for the Führer. I expected more. The Catholics failed Rosenberg!" Nevertheless, historian Ian Kershaw argues that even after accounting for the manipulation of the voting process, the results "reflected the fact that Hitler had the backing, much of it fervently enthusiastic, of the great majority of the German people."
Victor Klemperer, a Jewish German opposed to the Nazi regime, wrote in his diary that "One third said Yes out of fear, one third out of intoxication, one third out of fear and intoxication. And Eva and I also simply put a cross at No out of a certain degree of despair and not without fear." He added that "Hitler is the undisputed victor" despite "he five million No and spoiled ballots". Historian Sidney Fay said that the increase in the opposition vote relative to the 1933 referendum was expected due to conflicts with the church, economic difficulties, and the then-recent Night of the Long Knives (a purge on 30 June 1934 that ensured the army would continue to support Hitler's regime).
References
Footnotes
- Shirer 1960, pp. 183–184.
- McDonough 2021, p. 29.
- McDonough 2021, p. 33.
- McDonough 2021, p. 42.
- Beck 2018, p. 58.
- McDonough 2021, p. 53.
- McDonough 2021, pp. 53–54.
- McDonough 2021, p. 55.
- Enderis 1933, p. 5.
- Shirer 1960, p. 219.
- Evans 2005, pp. 30, 35–36.
- Böckenförde 2006, p. 110.
- Richter & Jessen 2018, p. 87.
- ^ Zurcher 1935, p. 91.
- Zurcher 1935, p. 92.
- Nohlen & Stöver 2010, p. 770.
- Zurcher 1935, p. 95.
- ^ Richter & Jessen 2018, p. 96.
- Shirer 1960, p. 214-215.
- McDonough 2021, p. 120.
- ^ Shirer 1960, p. 226.
- Pollock & Heneman 1934, p. 45.
- Evans 2005, p. 42.
- Pollock & Heneman 1934, pp. 45–46.
- Evans 2005, p. 110.
- Zurcher 1935, p. 94.
- Shirer 1960, p. 229.
- Urban 2011, p. 43.
- Zurcher 1935, p. 96.
- Reichsanzeiger 1934, p. 1.
- Birchall 1934, p. 5.
- Urban 2011, p. 42–43.
- Birchall 1934, p. 1.
- ^ Kershaw 1999, p. 526.
- Urban 2011, p. 43 (footnote 4).
- ^ Klemperer 1998, p. 82.
- Fay 1934, p. 105.
- Hancock 2011, p. 669.
Sources
- Beck, Hermann (2018). "The Nazi 'Seizure Of Power'". In Gellately, Robert (ed.). The Oxford illustrated history of the Third Reich (First ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-872828-3. OCLC 990674903.
- Birchall, Frederick T. (20 August 1934). "Hitler endorsed by 9 to 1 in poll on his dictatorship, but opposition is doubled; absolute power is won". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
- Böckenförde, Markus (July 2006). Riedel, Eibe; Wolfrum, Rüdiger (eds.). Constitutional Referendum in Germany — Country Report. XVIIth International Congress on Comparative Law. Beiträge zum ausländischen öffentlichen Recht und Völkerrecht. Vol. 188. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 107–125. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-37720-7_4. ISBN 978-3-540-37720-7.
- "Deutsche Reichsanzeiger und Preußische Staatsanzeiger" (in German). Berlin. 6 September 1934. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
- Enderis, Guido (27 March 1933). "Hitler Is Supreme Under Enabling Act". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 5 November 2023.
- Evans, Richard J. (May 2005). Winder, Simon; Moyers, Scott (eds.). The Third Reich in Power. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-1-59420-074-8. OCLC 61451667.
- Fay, Sidney B. (October 1934). "Hitler Holds a Plebiscite". Current History (1916–1940). 41 (1). University of California Press: 104–109. doi:10.1525/curh.1934.41.1.104. ISSN 2641-080X. JSTOR 45338399.
- Hancock, Eleanor (20 December 2011). "The Purge of the SA Reconsidered: "An Old Putschist Trick"?". Central European History. 44 (4). Cambridge University Press: 669–683. doi:10.1017/S0008938911000689. ISSN 0008-9389. JSTOR 41411643.
- Jones, Larry Eugene (June 2011). "Franz von Papen, Catholic Conservatives, and the Establishment of the Third Reich, 1933–1934". The Journal of Modern History. 83 (2). The University of Chicago Press: 272–318. doi:10.1086/659103. ISSN 0022-2801. JSTOR 10.1086/659103. S2CID 143231402.
- Kershaw, Ian (1999) . Hitler, 1889–1936: Hubris (1st American ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-04671-7. OCLC 50149322.
- Klemperer, Victor (1998). I will bear witness 1933–1941: A diary of the Nazi Years. Translated by Chalmers, Martin (Paperback ed.). New York: The Modern Library (published 1999). ISBN 978-0-375-75378-7. OCLC 42872151. Retrieved 4 February 2024.
- McDonough, Frank (2021). The Hitler years. Vol. 1: Triumph, 1933–1939 (First U.S. ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-1-250-27510-3. OCLC 1257308682.
- Nohlen, Dieter; Stöver, Philip (31 December 2010). Elections in Europe: a data handbook (1st ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7. OCLC 617565273.
- Overy, Richard (2004). The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia. London: W. W. Norton. ISBN 0393020304.
- Pollock, James K.; Heneman, Harlow James (1934). The Hitler decrees (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: George Wahr.
- Richter, Hedwig; Jessen, Ralph (2018). "Elections, Plebiscites, and Festivals". In Gellately, Robert (ed.). The Oxford illustrated history of the Third Reich (First ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-872828-3. OCLC 990674903.
- Shirer, William (1960). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-831-77404-2. OCLC 1313834918.
- Urban, Markus (2011). "The Self-Staging of a Plebiscitary Dictatorship: The NS-Regime Between 'Uniformed Reichstag', Referendum and Reichsparteitag". In Jessen, Ralph; Richter, Hedwig (eds.). Voting for Hitler and Stalin: Elections Under 20th Century Dictatorships. New York: Campus Verlag. ISBN 978-3-593-39489-3. OCLC 1330862582.
- Zurcher, Arnold J. (1935). "The Hitler Referenda". American Political Science Review. 29 (1): 91–99. doi:10.2307/1947171. JSTOR 1947171. S2CID 146390292.
 Elections and referendums in Germany | |
|---|---|
| Parliamentary elections | |
| Presidential elections | |
| European elections | |
| Referendums | |
| |