Misplaced Pages

Macana

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Type of weapon of Taíno origin For the palm tree commonly known as Macana, see Wettinia kalbreyeri.
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Spanish. (December 2019) Click for important translation instructions.
  • Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Misplaced Pages.
  • Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
  • You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Misplaced Pages article at ]; see its history for attribution.
  • You may also add the template {{Translated|es|Macana}} to the talk page.
  • For more guidance, see Misplaced Pages:Translation.

The term macana, of Taíno origin, refers to various wooden weapons used by the various native cultures of Central and South America. These weapons were referred to as a hadzab or hats'ab in Yucatecan Mayan.

Meaning and origin

The earliest meaning attributed to macana is a sword-like weapon made out of wood, but still sharp enough to be dangerous. The term is also sometimes applied to the similar Aztec weapon, which is studded with pieces of obsidian in order to create a blade, though some authorities distinguish this item by using the Nahuatl name macuahuitl.

In the Andes, the Spanish conquistadors applied the term "macana" to the several blunt, mace-like weapons at the disposal of the Inca army's arsenal, particularly to the Chaska chuqui (lit. star spear) and the Chambi (mace) weapons which consisted of a wooden shaft with a heavy metal (copper or bronze) or stone object at the end. As its name suggests, the Chaska chuqui tip was in a star shape to maximize the potential to break bone. They were the most common weapon in the Inca arsenal, and it is possible that gold or silver was used for the star for high-ranking officers.

In modern Spanish the word has broadened to refer to various types of blunt wooden weapons, especially a police nightstick, with a shape very similar to Okinawan tonfas.

Uses

The sizes of macanas are thought to have varied significantly, depending on the application. Most were about one meter long, though other macana varieties were larger. Diversity in macana size likely arose due to various factors, including battle strategy, combatant status or position in the military hierarchy, ethnopolitical group, or environmental factors such as availability of chulul wood. The most dominant iterations of macanas appear to be broad, flat wooden shafts with grooved edges flanked with obsidian blades held in place by resin or another mastic. Macana makers may have made their segments shorter to produce more of them per blade from this non-local resource, especially if obsidian grew increasingly scarce. The obsidian was imported into the lowlands from highland sources in Guatemala and Mexico, probably as preformed polyhedral cores.

One-handed use of macanas enables the user to hold a shield in the free hand while larger macana species typically necessitates two hands. Spanish reports during early battles with the Maya described their opponents' armaments included "words that appeared to be two-handed ones" and "two-handed swords of very strong wood obsidian."

Chaska chuqui
Inca macana

Archeological remains

Many of the obsidian shards used for macanas were prismatic blade segments, which are among the most abundant lithics at late sites in the Maya lowlands. Archeology in sites with macana remains has revealed that some sites, particularly those with large numbers of segments, had bimodal – smaller (ca. 8–10mm) and larger (ca. 20–24 +) – length distributions. This supports the possibility of two sizes of macanas.

Notes

  1. ^ Rice, Prudence M. (2022-10-02). "Macanas in the Postclassic Maya Lowlands? A Preliminary Look". Lithic Technology. 47 (4): 314–327. doi:10.1080/01977261.2022.2064126. ISSN 0197-7261. S2CID 248207015.
  2. Peter Martyr d'Anghiera, Decades de Orbe Novo (written in the early 16th century):
    • Cominus hi certant vt plurimum, ensibus oblongis, quos macanas ipsi appellant, ligneis tamen, quia ferrum non assequuntur...
    "In hand to hand combat they generally use long swords, which they call macanas, which are however made of wood, as they don't have knowledge of iron." (p. 127)
    • armatum ... arcubus putà & sagittis, machanísque, id est, ensibus amplis, ligneis, oblongis, vtráque manu agitandis...
    "...armed ... for example with bows and arrows, and macanas—that is, with large, wooden, long swords which are wielded two-handedly" (p. 180)
  3. Rowe, John Howland (1946). Inca Culture at the Time of the Spanish Conquest. U.S. Government Printing Office.
  4. ^ Pohl, John M. D. (1951- ). (2001). Aztec warrior AD 1325-1521. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-148-6. OCLC 1088972531.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  5. Obregón, Marco Antonio Cervera (October 2006). "Themacuahuitl: an innovative weapon of the Late Post-Classic in Mesoamerica". Arms & Armour. 3 (2): 127–148. doi:10.1179/174962606x136892. ISSN 1741-6124. S2CID 110602781.
  6. Yacubic, Matthew Patrick (2014). Community crafting and crafting community : the lithic artifacts of Zacpeten, Guatemala. ISBN 978-1-321-08885-4. OCLC 891667674.
  7. ^ Díaz del Castillo, Bernal (1974). Historia verdadera de la conquista de la Nueva España. Editorial Porrúa. OCLC 643804697.

External links

Sword types and classifications by region and historical era
Europe
Prehistory
Ancient period
Post-classical period
Early modern period
Late modern period
China
Ancient
Medieval
Ming – Qing
Modern
Korea
Bronze Age – Gojoseon
Iron Age – Three Kingdom Era
Goryeo and Joseon era
Japan
Yayoi – Nara periods
Heian – Kamakura periods
Muromachi – Edo periods
Meiji period and beyond
India
Ancient
Medieval and modern
Western and
Central Asia
Prehistory
Ancient period
Post-classical period
Early modern period
Indonesia
Early period
Late period
Philippines
Classical
Spanish colonization
Mainland
Southeast Asia
Classic stage
Post-Classic stage
Cambodia
Thailand
Mesoamerica
Pre-Columbian era
Africa
Ancient Egypt
Mainland
Categories: