IBM Corp. v. Commission | |
---|---|
Court | European Court of Justice |
Full case name | International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission of the European Communities |
Citation | (1981) Case 60/81 |
Keywords | |
Judicial review |
International Business Machines Corporation v. Commission (1981) Case 60/81 is an EU law case, concerning judicial review in the European Union.
Facts
The Commission initiated an investigation into IBM for engaging in anti-competitive practices such as offering bundles of hardware and software and refusing to provide software to customers unless hardware produced by IBM was used with it.
The Commission sent a letter to IBM informing it about the imminent proceedings for abusing its dominant position, under EU competition law, inviting it to put a case. IBM sought to challenge the letter in judicial review proceedings, and the question was whether the letter was a reviewable act.
Judgment
The Court of Justice held this letter was not a reviewable act, just a preliminary decision, and that IBM could only legally challenge the investigation after the Commission made its final decision. IBM was also ordered to cover the legal costs of the case.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (July 2016) |
See also
EU judicial review | |
---|---|
TFEU arts 263-267 | |
Deutsche Post v Commission (2011) C-463/10P | |
Plaumann & Co v Commission (1963) Case 25/62 | |
Unión de Pequeños Agricultores (2002) C-50/00 P | |
Kanatami v Parliament and Council (2013) C-583/11 | |
Piraiki-Patraiki v Commission (1985) Case 11/82 | |
See EU law |
References
This case law article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |