Misplaced Pages

This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: Does not yet include recent discoveries related to the understanding of exoplanet's internal structure - e.g, the detection of likely chthonian planet TOI-849 b, 2024 insights to the core of WASP-107b according to Webb's observation, two super-Mercury planets in HD 23472 system.. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (September 2024)

Over the years, our ability to detect, confirm, and characterize exoplanets and their atmospheres has improved, allowing researchers to begin constraining exoplanet interior composition and structure. While most exoplanet science is focused on exoplanetary atmospheric environments, the mass and radius of a planet can tell us about a planet's density, and hence, its internal processes. The internal processes of a planet are partly responsible for its atmosphere, and so they are also a determining factor in a planet's capacity to support life.

As there are over 5,600 different exoplanets and more being discovered every year, it is difficult to group them by interior type. However, NASA has broadly classified them based on their interior and exterior as a gas giant, super earth, Neptune-like, or terrestrial. Within each of these groups are several sub classifications ("hot Jupiter's", "mini-Neptune's", etc.) with many theoretical exoplanet interiors being hypothesized ("chthonian planets", "water worlds", planets with tiny cores or massive mantles, etc.); however, there is no standardized classification of exoplanet interiors.

Methods

Because humans cannot travel to exoplanets and take direct measurements, scientists must use other methods to constrain their interior composition. Measuring a planet's mass and radius - characteristics that can be observed - can give clues to its internal structure. We can infer these characteristics from both the transit method and radial velocity method. As a planet transits in front of its star, the planet's radius can be determined from the reduction in light from the star. Similarly, because the planet's pull on the star causes the star to orbit around the barycenter which is not in the stars centre of mass, we can use the resulting Doppler shifts of starlight to infer the mass of the planet relative to its parent star. Within the Solar System, rocky planets have a mantle and crust containing silicates, oxides, and silicate melts, and an iron-rich core. The principal elements that compose rocky planets, which are magnesium, iron, oxygen, carbon, and silicon, are assumed to be universal in the interiors of these planet types. The abundance of these elements, as well as the heating and cooling processes they undergo during planet formation, are responsible for the planet's final composition. By measuring the mass and radius of exoplanets, the mean density of the planet can be calculated. Dense planets must have a higher proportion of heavier elements such as iron, whereas lighter planets must have higher concentrations of lighter elements such as hydrogen. However, mean density does not distinguish how different components are distributed within a planet's interior; a dense planet might have its dense material packed into a small core, or distributed through its mantle.

In addition to analyzing mass-radius relationships of planets, researchers also look to the composition of a planet's host star when hypothesizing a planet's interior composition. This is because planets and their host stars originate from the same system, so they share the same material from the accretion disk. Although planets will not have the exact same composition as their host star, they would share similar fractions of certain elements. For example, in metal-poor areas of the galaxy containing metal-poor stars, researchers assume that planets also have less metal abundance compared to systems and stars that are richer in metals. The iron abundance of a system is particularly important since it is a common component in planetary interiors, along with elements such as nickel and metallic alloys. Iron is a relatively heavy element that is believed to exist universally in rocky planets. This iron can exist in the mantle in silicates and oxides if it is oxidized, but otherwise will form a terrestrial planet's core as a metal. Hence, the availability of oxygen, along with similarities in mass and radius to known rocky planets, can help indicate the possibility of a mantle with oxidized iron.

A newer method of analyzing exoplanet interiors is by looking at just their core mass, radius, and composition instead of the entire planet - such as with the James Webb Space Telescope. In mid 2024, The Webb telescope was able to measure an exoplanet's interior for the first time. This provided new insight into WASP-107b with a new methane measurement which was 1000 times lower then expected.

Possible interior types

The Solar System has a variety of planetary interiors; Earth has an inner and outer core (reaching to approximately 55% of Earth's radius), mantle, and crust, and Venus is commonly thought to have a similar structure. Mercury has a much larger core radius that 80% of the planetary radius, as well as a mantle that is much more abundant in sulfur and much less abundant in iron relative to the other terrestrial planets. Mars has a relatively smaller core, and a mantle containing roughly twice the mass fraction of iron compared to the Earth. The cores of the outer planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune are much less understood, though it is believed Jupiter and Saturn have cores containing iron and nickel at temperatures and pressures far higher than those seen in the interiors of the inner, rocky planets. In addition, the interiors of the outer planets have much more ice and volatiles relative to the inner rocky planets.

Because the planets in the Solar System contain a diverse set of interiors, the interiors of exoplanets likely exhibit similar or even greater diversity. For example, the thickness of a planetary crust is directly proportional to how quickly the planet cooled after its formation. A fast cooling rate is expected for a smaller planet, a low-mass planet, or a planet that is further away from its star. Such planets would have a proportionally thicker crust, as is seen in the Moon and Mars.

However, there are types of planets that are not seen in the Solar System, such as low-density "hot Jupiters", which are hotter and larger than the Solar System's gas giants. Observers have also found many "super-Earths" or "mini-Neptunes", i.e. planets with a radius between that of Earth and Neptune, whose radius is 4 times that of Earth. The existence of planet types not represented in the Solar System suggests the existence of planetary interiors that are likewise not represented in the Solar System. Some proposed interior types include tiny cores, massive mantles, and an ocean surface with no continents: or, a massive core and mantle, or perhaps there can be planets with an ice layer between its mantle and surface, both above a core. Another proposed interior is a chthonian planet, a gas giant like a "hot Jupiter" that has had the outer hydrogen and helium layers stripped away leaving what looks like a rocky planet behind.

There are no confirmed examples of these proposed interior structures. However, there are hypotheses of the potential internal structures of some exoplanets. One such example is GJ 1214b, that has a mass 6.55 times greater than the Earth's and is 2.68 times the radius of Earth, but only approximately one-third Earth's density. GJ 1214b's density of1870 kg m is too low to represent a dominantly metal and silicate rock composition, despite the large size of the planet. Three different types of interior makeup have been hypothesized for this planet. One is that the planet has an iron core, a mantle composed of silicates, and an outermost layer of water, which supports a thick envelope of hydrogen and helium. Another hypothesis keeps the iron core and silicate mantle assumption, but eliminates the water outer layer, and requires a thicker hydrogen/helium envelope. A third hypothesis proposes that the planet is mostly water, and has a large atmosphere composed mostly of steam. In 2020, TOI-849b became a candidate for being a chthonian planet as it has a small radius but disproportionately large mass.

As more exoplanets are discovered, the range of types of planets also grows, beyond planet types not seen in the Solar System. Some exoplanets may resemble the Earth in radius, but are much less dense or much denser. Other exoplanets can resemble Earth in density, but have a very different size. As such, it is difficult to classify potential planetary interiors based on their similarities to Solar System objects.

Continued exoplanet discoveries allow a statistical analysis of planet types, and the identification of distinct planetary populations of certain mass and radii. This allows an expansion of the definition of categories such as "terrestrial" planets or "gas giants" beyond that seen in the Solar System, to the range of all known exoplanets.

Habitability

The relevance of planetary-scale cycles to habitability drives much research into exoplanetary interiors. On Earth, surface and sub-surface processes such as plate tectonics, outer core convection powering the geodynamo which creates our magnetic field, and the cycling of material between the surface and interior contribute to the climate and atmospheric composition of Earth, and hence, its habitability. Because of this, the understanding of planetary interiors is becoming more popular as the study of planetary habitability grows as well. Earth is the only known planet to harbor life, so in the search for life in exoplanets, many researchers focus on searching for conditions of early or modern Earth, in particular the presence of atmospheric oxygen. Similarly, in the search for habitable planets, those that are similar to Earth (mass, radius, interior structure) are of special interest.

In addition, a planet's size and mass contribute to whether it can retain its atmosphere. Planets that are less massive have a weaker gravitational pull and are less able to retain an atmosphere. Life as we know it requires an atmosphere, so planets that have the right composition to achieve adequate planetary mass are key in determining the habitability of the planet. The presence of a magnetic field also contributes to a planet's habitability, and signatures of a possible exoplanetary magnetic field have been detected. Continued atmospheric observations that search for a magnetic field, when paired with calculations of the interior compositions of exoplanets, may provide further insight into the interior structure of an exoplanet.

References

1. "Exoplanets - NASA Science". science.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
2. "Cosmic Milestone: NASA Confirms 5,000 Exoplanets". NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL). Retrieved 2024-12-15.
3. Howe, Alex R.; Burrows, Adam; Verne, Wesley (May 2014). "Mass-Radius Relations and Core-Envelope Decompositions of Super-Earths and Sub-Neptunes". The Astrophysical Journal. 787 (2): 173. arXiv:1402.4818. Bibcode:2014ApJ...787..173H. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/173. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 119112221.
4. "What makes a planet habitable? | Earth & Planets Laboratory". epl.carnegiescience.edu. Retrieved 2022-02-15.
5. ^ Van Hoolst, Tim; Noack, Lena; Rivoldini, Attilio (2019-01-01). "Exoplanet interiors and habitability". Advances in Physics: X. 4 (1): 1630316. Bibcode:2019AdPhX...430316V. doi:10.1080/23746149.2019.1630316. S2CID 198417434.
6. Adibekyan, Vardan; Dorn, Caroline; Sousa, Sérgio G.; Santos, Nuno C.; Bitsch, Bertram; Israelian, Garik; Mordasini, Christoph; Barros, Susana C. C.; Delgado Mena, Elisa; Demangeon, Olivier D. S.; Faria, João P. (2021-10-15). "A compositional link between rocky exoplanets and their host stars". Science. 374 (6565): 330–332. arXiv:2102.12444. Bibcode:2021Sci...374..330A. doi:10.1126/science.abg8794. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 34648350. S2CID 238990985.
7. Morgan, John W.; Anders, Edward (1980-12-01). "Chemical composition of Earth, Venus, and Mercury". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 77 (12): 6973–6977. Bibcode:1980PNAS...77.6973M. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.12.6973. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 350422. PMID 16592930.
8. Lodders, Katharina (2003-07-10). "Solar System Abundances and Condensation Temperatures of the Elements". The Astrophysical Journal. 591 (2): 1220–1247. Bibcode:2003ApJ...591.1220L. doi:10.1086/375492. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 42498829.
9. Putirka, Keith D.; Dorn, Caroline; Hinkel, Natalie R.; Unterborn, Cayman T. (2021-08-01). "Compositional Diversity of Rocky Exoplanets". Elements. 17 (4): 235–240. arXiv:2108.08383. Bibcode:2021Eleme..17..235P. doi:10.2138/gselements.17.4.235. ISSN 1811-5209. S2CID 237213299.
10. Molar Candanosa, Roberto (2024-05-20). "Webb telescope offers first glimpse of an exoplanet's interior". The Hub. Retrieved 2024-12-15.
11. Sing, David K.; Rustamkulov, Zafar; Thorngren, Daniel P.; Barstow, Joanna K.; Tremblin, Pascal; Alves de Oliveira, Catarina; Beck, Tracy L.; Birkmann, Stephan M.; Challener, Ryan C.; Crouzet, Nicolas; Espinoza, Néstor; Ferruit, Pierre; Giardino, Giovanna; Gressier, Amélie; Lee, Elspeth K. H. (June 2024). "A warm Neptune's methane reveals core mass and vigorous atmospheric mixing". Nature. 630 (8018): 831–835. doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07395-z. ISSN 1476-4687.
12. "In Depth | Venus". NASA Solar System Exploration. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
13. Rivoldini, A.; Van Hoolst, T. (2013-09-01). "The interior structure of Mercury constrained by the low-degree gravity field and the rotation of Mercury". Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 377–378: 62–72. Bibcode:2013E&PSL.377...62R. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.07.021. ISSN 0012-821X.
14. Nittler, Larry R.; Starr, Richard D.; Weider, Shoshana Z.; McCoy, Timothy J.; Boynton, William V.; Ebel, Denton S.; Ernst, Carolyn M.; Evans, Larry G.; Goldsten, John O.; Hamara, David K.; Lawrence, David J. (2011-09-30). "The Major-Element Composition of Mercury's Surface from MESSENGER X-ray Spectrometry". Science. 333 (6051): 1847–1850. Bibcode:2011Sci...333.1847N. doi:10.1126/science.1211567. PMID 21960623. S2CID 34832522.
15. Van Hoolst, Tim; Noack, Lena; Rivoldini, Attilio (2019). "Exoplanet interiors and habitability". Advances in Physics: X. 4 (1). Bibcode:2019AdPhX...430316V. doi:10.1080/23746149.2019.1630316. S2CID 198417434.
16. Guillot, Tristan; Stevenson, David J.; Hubbard, William B.; Saumon, Didier (2004), Bagenal, Fran; Dowling, Timothy E.; McKinnon, William B. (eds.), The Interior of Jupiter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–57, ISBN 978-0-521-81808-7, retrieved 2022-02-17
17. ^ Sotin, C.; Jackson, J. M.; Seager, S. (2010), Seager, Sara; Dotson, Renée (eds.), Terrestrial Planet Interiors, Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, pp. 375–395, ISBN 978-0-8165-2945-2, retrieved 2022-03-01
18. Wang, Ji; Fischer, Debra A.; Horch, Elliott P.; Huang, Xu (January 2015). "On the Occurrence Rate of Hot Jupiters in Different Stellar Environments". The Astrophysical Journal. 799 (2): 229. arXiv:1412.1731. Bibcode:2015ApJ...799..229W. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/229. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 119117019.
19. "Super-Earth | Planet Types". Exoplanet Exploration: Planets Beyond our Solar System. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
20. Hébrard, G.; Étangs, A. Lecavelier des; Vidal-Madjar, A.; Désert, J.-M.; Ferlet, R. (2003-12-15), Evaporation rate of hot Jupiters and formation of Chthonian planets, doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0312384, retrieved 2024-12-15
21. Charbonneau, David; Berta, Zachory K.; Irwin, Jonathan; Burke, Christopher J.; Nutzman, Philip; Buchhave, Lars A.; Lovis, Christophe; Bonfils, Xavier; Latham, David W.; Udry, Stéphane; Murray-Clay, Ruth A. (December 2009). "A super-Earth transiting a nearby low-mass star". Nature. 462 (7275): 891–894. arXiv:0912.3229. Bibcode:2009Natur.462..891C. doi:10.1038/nature08679. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 20016595. S2CID 4360404.
22. Rogers, L. A.; Seager, S. (2010-06-01). "Three Possible Origins for the Gas Layer on GJ 1214b". The Astrophysical Journal. 716 (2): 1208–1216. arXiv:0912.3243. Bibcode:2010ApJ...716.1208R. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1208. hdl:1721.1/74039. ISSN 0004-637X. S2CID 15288792.
23. Armstrong, David J.; Lopez, Théo A.; Adibekyan, Vardan; Booth, Richard A.; Bryant, Edward M.; Collins, Karen A.; Deleuil, Magali; Emsenhuber, Alexandre; Huang, Chelsea X.; King, George W.; Lillo-Box, Jorge; Lissauer, Jack J.; Matthews, Elisabeth; Mousis, Olivier; Nielsen, Louise D. (July 2020). "A remnant planetary core in the hot-Neptune desert". Nature. 583 (7814): 39–42. doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2421-7. ISSN 1476-4687.
24. Shahar, Anat; Driscoll, Peter; Weinberger, Alycia; Cody, George (2019-05-03). "What makes a planet habitable?". Science. 364 (6439): 434–435. Bibcode:2019Sci...364..434S. doi:10.1126/science.aaw4326. PMID 31048476. S2CID 143435166.
25. Schwieterman, Edward W.; Kiang, Nancy Y.; Parenteau, Mary N.; Harman, Chester E.; DasSarma, Shiladitya; Fisher, Theresa M.; Arney, Giada N.; Hartnett, Hilairy E.; Reinhard, Christopher T.; Olson, Stephanie L.; Meadows, Victoria S. (2018-06-01). "Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life". Astrobiology. 18 (6): 663–708. arXiv:1705.05791. Bibcode:2018AsBio..18..663S. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1729. ISSN 1531-1074. PMC 6016574. PMID 29727196.
26. Meadows, Victoria S.; Reinhard, Christopher T.; Arney, Giada N.; Parenteau, Mary N.; Schwieterman, Edward W.; Domagal-Goldman, Shawn D.; Lincowski, Andrew P.; Stapelfeldt, Karl R.; Rauer, Heike; DasSarma, Shiladitya; Hegde, Siddharth (June 2018). "Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment". Astrobiology. 18 (6): 630–662. arXiv:1705.07560. Bibcode:2018AsBio..18..630M. doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1727. ISSN 1531-1074. PMC 6014580. PMID 29746149.
27. Ben-Jaffel, Lotfi; Ballester, Gilda E.; Muñoz, Antonio García; Lavvas, Panayotis; Sing, David K.; Sanz-Forcada, Jorge; Cohen, Ofer; Kataria, Tiffany; Henry, Gregory W.; Buchhave, Lars; Mikal-Evans, Thomas (January 2022). "Signatures of strong magnetization and a metal-poor atmosphere for a Neptune-sized exoplanet". Nature Astronomy. 6 (1): 141–153. arXiv:2211.05155. Bibcode:2022NatAs...6..141B. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01505-x. ISSN 2397-3366. S2CID 245316715.

v t e Exoplanets
Planet Definition IAU Planetary science
Main topics	Exoplanet Exoplanet orbital and physical parameters Methods of detecting exoplanets Planetary system Planet-hosting stars
Sizes and types	Terrestrial Carbon planet Coreless planet Desert planet Dwarf planet Hycean planet Ice planet Iron planet (Super-Mercury) Lava planet Ocean world Mega-Earth Sub-Earth Super-Earth Gaseous Eccentric Jupiter Mini-Neptune (Gas dwarf) Helium planet Hot Jupiter Hot Neptune Gas giant Ice giant Super-Jupiter Super-Neptune Super-puff Ultra-hot Jupiter Ultra-hot Neptune Other types Blanet Brown dwarf Chthonian planet Circumbinary planet Circumtriple planet Disrupted planet Double planet Ecumenopolis Eyeball planet Giant planet Mesoplanet Planemo Planet/Brown dwarf boundary Planetesimal Protoplanet Pulsar planet Sub-brown dwarf Sub-Neptune Toroidal planet Ultra-cool dwarf Ultra-short period planet (USP)
Formation and evolution	Accretion Accretion disk Asteroid belt Circumplanetary disk Circumstellar disc Circumstellar envelope Cosmic dust Debris disk Detached object Disrupted planet Excretion disk Exozodiacal dust Extraterrestrial materials Extraterrestrial sample curation Giant-impact hypothesis Gravitational collapse Hills cloud Internal structure Interplanetary dust cloud Interplanetary medium Interplanetary space Interstellar cloud Interstellar dust Interstellar medium Interstellar space Kuiper belt List of interstellar and circumstellar molecules Merging stars Molecular cloud Nebular hypothesis Oort cloud Outer space Planetary migration Planetary system Planetesimal Planet formation Protoplanetary disk Ring system Rubble pile Sample-return mission Scattered disc Star formation
Systems	Exocomet Interstellar Exomoon Tidally detached Rogue planet Orbits Retrograde Trojan Mean-motion resonances Titius–Bode law
Host stars	A B Binary star Brown dwarfs F/Yellow-white dwarfs G/Yellow dwarfs Herbig Ae/Be K/Orange dwarfs M/Red dwarfs Pulsar Red giant Subdwarf B Subgiant T Tauri White dwarfs Yellow giants
Detection	Astrometry Direct imaging list Microlensing list Polarimetry Timing list Radial velocity list Transit method list Transit-timing variation
Habitability	Astrobiology Astrooceanography Circumstellar habitable zone Earth analog Extraterrestrial liquid water Galactic habitable zone Habitability of binary star systems Habitability of F-type main-sequence star systems Habitability of K-type main-sequence star systems Habitability of natural satellites Habitability of neutron star systems Habitability of red dwarf systems Habitability of yellow dwarf systems Habitable zone for complex life List of potentially habitable exoplanets Tholin Superhabitable planet
Catalogues	Nearby Habitable Systems Exoplanet Data Explorer Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia NASA Exoplanet Archive NASA Star and Exoplanet Database Open Exoplanet Catalogue
Lists	Exoplanetary systems Host stars Multiplanetary systems Stars with proto-planetary discs Exoplanets Discoveries Extremes Firsts Nearest Largest Heaviest Terrestrial candidates Kepler 1–500 501–1000 1001–1500 1501–2000 K2 Potentially habitable Proper names Discovered exoplanets by year before 2000 2000–2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Other	Carl Sagan Institute Exoplanet naming convention Exoplanet phase curves Exoplanetary Circumstellar Environments and Disk Explorer Extragalactic planet Extrasolar planets in fiction Geodynamics of terrestrial exoplanets Neptunian desert Nexus for Exoplanet System Science Planets in globular clusters Small planet radius gap Sudarsky's gas giant classification
Discoveries of exoplanets Search projects

• Exoplanets
• Planetary geology