Misplaced Pages

1890 United States census
← 1880 June 2, 1890 (1890-06-02) 1900 →
Seal of the Department of the Interior
1890 census form
General information
Country	United States
Authority	Census Office
Results
Total population	62,979,766 ( 25.5%)
Most populous state	New York 6,003,174
Least populous state	Nevada 47,335

The 1890 United States census was taken beginning June 2, 1890. The census determined the resident population of the United States to be 62,979,766, an increase of 25.5 percent over the 50,189,209 persons enumerated during the 1880 census. The data reported that the distribution of the population had resulted in the disappearance of the American frontier.

This was the first census in which a majority of states recorded populations of over one million and the first in which three cities, New York City, Chicago, and Philadelphia, recorded populations of over one million. The census also saw Chicago rise in rank to the nation's second-most populous city, a position it would hold until Los Angeles, the 57th-most populous city as of 1890, supplanted it in 1990. This was the first U.S. census to use machines to tabulate the collected data.

Most of the 1890 census materials were destroyed on January 10, 1921, when the Commerce Department building caught fire, and in the subsequent disposal of the remaining damaged records.

Census questions

The 1890 census collected the following information:

• address
• number of families in house
• number of persons in house
• names
• whether a soldier, sailor or marine (Union or Confederate) during the American Civil War, or a widow of such person
• relationship to head of family
• race, described as white, black, mulatto, quadroon, octoroon, Chinese, Japanese, or Indian
• sex
• age
• marital status
• married within the year
• mother of how many children, and number now living
• place of birth of person, and their father and mother
• if foreign-born, number of years in U.S.
• whether naturalized
• whether naturalization papers have been taken out
• profession, trade or occupation
• months unemployed during census year
• ability to read and write
• ability to speak English, and, if unable, language or dialect spoken
• whether suffering from acute or chronic disease, with name of disease and length of time afflicted
• whether defective in mind, sight, hearing or speech, or whether crippled, maimed or deformed, with name of defect
• whether a prisoner, convict, homeless child, or pauper
• home rented, or owned by head or member of family, and, if owned, whether free from mortgage
• if farmer, whether farm is rented, or owned by head or member of family; if owned, whether free from mortgage; if rented, post office box of owner

Methodology

The 1890 census was the first to be compiled using methods invented by Herman Hollerith and was overseen by Superintendents Robert P. Porter (1889–1893) and Carroll D. Wright (1893–1897). Data was entered on a machine readable medium (punched cards) and tabulated by machine. Changes from the 1880 census included the larger population, the number of data items to be collected from individuals, the Census Bureau headcount, the volume of scheduled publications, and the use of Hollerith's electromechanical tabulators. The net effect of these changes was to reduce the time required to process the census from eight years for the 1880 census to six years for the 1890 census. The total population of 62,947,714, the family, or rough, count, was announced after only six weeks of processing (punched cards were not used for this tabulation). The public reaction to this tabulation was disbelief, as it was widely believed that the "right answer" was at least 75,000,000.

Significant findings

The United States census of 1890 showed a total of 248,253 Native Americans living in the United States, down from 400,764 Native Americans identified in the census of 1850.

The 1890 census announced that the frontier region of the United States no longer existed, and that the Census Bureau would no longer track the westward migration of the U.S. population.

By 1890, settlement in the American West had reached sufficient population density that the frontier line had disappeared. For the 1890 census, the Census Bureau released a bulletin declaring the closing of the frontier, stating: "Up to and including 1880 the country had a frontier of settlement, but at present the unsettled area has been so broken into by isolated bodies of settlement that there can hardly be said to be a frontier line. In the discussion of its extent, its westward movement, etc., it can not, therefore, any longer have a place in the census reports."

Statisticians at the time argued that the results of the 1890 census was most likely an undercount of the total population in the United States from anywhere between one million to several millions, and that African Americans, working class people, and young children were most likely to be undercounted.

Data availability

The original data for the 1890 census is mostly unavailable. The population schedules were damaged in a fire in the basement of the U.S. Department of Commerce building in Washington, D.C. in 1921. Some 25% of the materials were presumed destroyed and another 50% damaged by smoke and water, although the actual damage may have been closer to 15–25%. The damage to the records led to an outcry for a permanent National Archives. In December 1932, following standard federal record-keeping procedures, the Chief Clerk of the Bureau of the Census sent the Librarian of Congress a list of papers to be destroyed, including the original 1890 census schedules. The Librarian was asked by the Bureau to identify any records which should be retained for historical purposes, but the Librarian did not accept the census records. Congress authorized destruction of that list of records on February 21, 1933, and the surviving original 1890 census records were destroyed by government order by 1934 or 1935. Few sets of microdata from the 1890 census survive. Aggregate data for small areas, together with compatible cartographic boundary files, can be downloaded from the National Historical Geographic Information System.

State rankings

Rank	State	Population
01	New York	6,003,174
02	Pennsylvania	5,258,113
03	Illinois	3,826,352
04	Ohio	3,672,329
05	Missouri	2,679,185
06	Massachusetts	2,238,947
07	Texas	2,235,527
08	Indiana	2,192,404
09	Michigan	2,093,890
10	Iowa	1,912,297
11	Kentucky	1,858,635
12	Georgia	1,837,353
13	Tennessee	1,767,518
14	Wisconsin	1,693,330
15	Virginia	1,655,980
16	North Carolina	1,617,949
17	Alabama	1,513,401
18	New Jersey	1,444,933
19	Kansas	1,428,108
20	Minnesota	1,310,283
21	Mississippi	1,289,600
22	California	1,213,398
23	South Carolina	1,151,149
24	Arkansas	1,128,211
25	Louisiana	1,118,588
26	Nebraska	1,062,656
27	Maryland	1,042,390
28	West Virginia	762,794
29	Connecticut	746,258
30	Maine	661,086
31	Colorado	413,249
32	Florida	391,422
33	New Hampshire	376,530
34	Washington	357,232
35	South Dakota	348,600
36	Rhode Island	345,506
37	Vermont	332,422
38	Oregon	317,704
X	Oklahoma	258,657
X	District of Columbia	230,392
X	Utah	210,779
39	North Dakota	190,983
40	Delaware	168,493
X	New Mexico	160,282
41	Montana	142,924
42	Idaho	88,548
X	Arizona	88,243
43	Wyoming	62,555
44	Nevada	47,355
X	Alaska	32,052

City rankings

References

1. "Library Bibliography Bulletin 88, New York State Census Records, 1790–1925". New York State Library. October 1981. p. 44 (p. 50 of PDF). Archived from the original on January 30, 2009. Retrieved December 15, 2008.
2. ^ Truesdell, Leon E. (1965). The Development of Punch Card Tabulation in the Bureau of the Census: 1890–1940. US GPO.
3. Report of the Commissioner of Labor In Charge of The Eleventh Census to the Secretary of the Interior for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 1895. Washington, DC: United States Government Publishing Office. July 29, 1895. hdl:2027/osu.32435067619882. OCLC 867910652. p. 9: "You may confidently look for the rapid reduction of the force of this office after the 1st of October, and the entire cessation of clerical work during the present calendar year. ... The condition of the work of the Census Division and the condition of the final reports show clearly that the work of the Eleventh Census will be completed at least two years earlier than was the work of the Tenth Census." — Carroll D. Wright, Commissioner of Labor in Charge
4. "Population and Area (Historical Censuses)" (PDF). United States Census Bureau. Archived (PDF) from the original on June 24, 2008. Retrieved June 20, 2008.
5. Austrian, Geoffrey D. (1982). Herman Hollerith: Forgotten Giant of Information Processing. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 85–86. ISBN 0-231-05146-8.
6. Dippie, Brian W. (1982). The Vanishing American: White Attitudes and U.S. Indian Policy. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press. p. ??. ISBN 0-8195-5056-6. The data yielded by this census provided strong evidence that the United States' policies towards Native Americans had had a significant impact on the enumeration of the census in the second half of the 19th century. US domestic policy combined with wars, genocide, famine, disease, a declining birthrate, and exogamy (with the children of biracial families declaring themselves to be white rather than Indian) accounted for the decrease in the enumeration of the census. Chalk, Frank; Jonassohn, Kurt (1990). The History and Sociology of Genocide: Analyses and Case Studies. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-04446-1.
7. Porter, Robert; Gannett, Henry; Hunt, William (1895). "Progress of the Nation", in "Report on Population of the United States at the Eleventh Census: 1890, Part 1". Bureau of the Census. pp. xviii–xxxiv.
8. Turner, Frederick Jackson (1920). "The Significance of the Frontier in American History". The Frontier in American History. p. 1.
9. Gannett, Henry (1894). "Was the Count of Population in 1890 Reasonably Correct?". Publications of the American Statistical Association. 4 (28/29): 99–102. doi:10.2307/2276233. ISSN 1522-5437. JSTOR 2276233.
10. Blake, Kellee (Spring 1996). "First in the Path of the Firemen: The Fate of the 1890 Population Census, Part 1". Prologue Magazine. 28 (1). Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration. ISSN 0033-1031. OCLC 321015582. Retrieved April 13, 2013.
11. Blake, Kellee (Spring 1996). "First in the Path of the Firemen: The Fate of the 1890 Population Census, Part 3". Prologue Magazine. 28 (1). Washington, DC: National Archives and Records Administration. ISSN 0033-1031. OCLC 321015582. Retrieved April 13, 2013.
12. "Availability of 1890 Census – History". U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved March 28, 2017.
13. Including Indian Territory, which was yet to be combined with Oklahoma Territory to form the state of Oklahoma.
14. The District of Columbia is not a state but was created with the passage of the Residence Act of 1790.
15. Population of the 100 Largest Cities and Other Urban Places in the United States: 1790 to 1990, U.S. Census Bureau, 1998
16. "Regions and Divisions". U.S. Census Bureau. Archived from the original on December 3, 2016. Retrieved September 9, 2016.

External links

• Mayo-Smith, Richmond (1891), "The Eleventh Census of the United States". In: The Economic Journal (EJ), Vol. 1, pp. 43–58 (in Wikisource)
• Walker, Francis A. (1888). "The Eleventh Census of the United States". The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2 (2): 135–161.
• 1891 U.S Census Report Contains 1890 census results
• Historical US Census data from the U.S. Census Bureau website
• Hollerith 1890 Census Tabulator by Columbia University
• "The Fate of the 1890 Population Census" from the National Archives website

• 1890 in the United States
• 1890 censuses
• United States census
• Lost documents